While there have always been explicit rules of grammar, punctuation, and other elements of writing, the general guidelines for compelling fiction are much more subjective, intuitive, and, well, squishy. Even some of the more traditional, hard fast principles of effective storytelling are becoming less rigid. Novelists and short story writers have to rely more on what feels right rather than what is right.
This notion became a discussion topic in workshop last week when one of my peers mentioned she was grappling with a sense of “not quite rightness.” Often we write a story or paragraph or even just a sentence, and we know something is amiss. We can’t always identify it ourselves from our intimate perspective (hence the need for workshops and editors), but we know something is not quite right. Unfortunately, with fewer and fewer writing “rules” to guide us, finding and fixing whatever it is that’s niggling us isn’t always easy.
Last night, for example, I was working on a coma scene. (I know…the cheery life I live is almost sinful.) I’m truly grateful to have absolutely no firsthand knowledge of injuries to the brain or nervous system, so I had to do some research. I learned all about the Glasgow Coma Scale and what the points on the index suggest in terms of recovery. I familiarized myself with some of the medical terminology used in dialogue about brain injury and comas and wrote what I felt was a believable hospital scene. Still, something about the passage was not quite right. It was factual, yes, but something about the order of events and interaction among the conscious characters troubled me.
For me, the fact that I can now read my fiction and have it trouble me is the victory. Two years ago, I would be less able to detect inconsistencies, ornamentation, timeline gaps, or POV shifts. I would be weakening my verbs with lovely and unnecessary adverbs and defending my darlings staunchly. Now I can read something I have written and really like, admire its stylistic or technical merits for a moment, and then highlight and delete it without too much angst. Like developing a nose for wine, honing a writer’s intuition takes practice, attention to subtle attributes, and engagement of all the senses – and possibly a few headaches.

Michelle— Glad you posted this. It will work as a good testimony for my English 1301 students.
Revision and multiple drafting are always good moments—I try very hard to instill these concepts in their heads… but honestly, sometimes even I have trouble rebuilding a passage more than once… for me it depends on the urgency of the piece. In other words, how important is it to me in the end. The greater the value, the longer the time invested. The stronger the message, the greater the involvement.
David-Glen,
I’m glad this resonated with you. For more on revision, you and your students may want to read “Demons and Darlings” (posted August 12, 2010) and “Last Writes” (posted April 28, 2010). Both of these posts can be found in the Archetype Favorites category or in their respective months under Archives.
Thanks for visiting!
Michelle
[...] theme on Archetype; “In Celebration of Technique,” “Last Writes,” “More is More,” “Not Quite Write,” and “Drafting Perfection” are a few of my personal favorites. However, it is the angst of [...]
Hi Michelle
Not Quite Right spoke to me heaps. It hit me in the guts with what I think it was an envy punch. I hope for the day that, “I can read something I have written and really like, admire its stylistic or technical merits for a moment, and then highlight and delete it without too much angst.”
I’ve been toying with enrolling in a Diploma of Education, to put myself in harms way of the grammar and punctuation thugs, and hopefully come out of it a more robust Englishman (though really I’m a Aussie in an English colony if the truth be known). But your profile has me considering creative writing now. Thank you and I look forward to listening to more of your voice (yeh, we read the pages with our eyes, but what bounces back are voices and echoes).
In Windmill Ridge, is 4:13 good research or good faith?
GBU
Jimmy
Hi, Jimmy –
Thank you for your comments – it’s nice to know how much this post resonated with you! I’ve written several posts on the self-editing process and other technical aspects of writing. You may want to check out “Last Writes,” “In conclusion…,” and “In Celebration of Technique,” as well. (The links to all of these are in the “Best of Archetype” sidebar.)
I cannot recommend an MFA or other creative writing program enough. It’s been an amazing journey that extends far beyond the classroom or workshop. “Why Write,” “Demons and Darlings,” and “Antisocial or socially isolated?” address the urge to write and the misconceptions we encounter when we respond to that urge.
“Windmill Ridge” is based on actual events that occurred during one of my marathon training runs. The 4:13 refers to both my marathon race goal of four hours and thirteen minutes and Philippians 4:13: “I can do everything through him who gives me strength” (NIV, 1988). The surprise twist ending is chilling; I hope to have this story published someday soon, so I can’t reveal any spoilers.
Thanks again for visiting – I wish you all the best!
Michelle